آزمون تافل در مجموع 30 دقیقه برای مهارت Writing زمان تعیین کرده است. دو سوال برای این بخش وجود دارد:
- نوشتن یکپارچه Integrated Writing Response (20 دقیقه):
- حدود سه دقیقه زمان دارید ت یک متن کوتاه را بخوانید. این متن در خصوص یک موضوع آکادمیک هست که یک موضوع را معرفی می کند و سه موضوع یا سه تئوری در ارتباط با موضوع را مدعی می شود.
- سپس، مرتبط با آن موضوغ به یک سخنرانی یک استاد در حدود دو دقیقه گوش می دهید، سخنران این سه جنبه یا تئوری را رد یا به چالش می کشد.
- در نهایت، شما باید در خصوص آنچه خوانده اید و گوش داده اید یک متن مینویسید. این متن می باید بیش از 150 کلمه باشد.
- نوشتن مستقل Academic Discussion Response (10 دقیقه):
- شما یک سوال نوشته شده توسط یک استاد و پاسخ های نوشته شده توسط دو دانشجو را می خوانید. وظیفه شما این است که همه چیز را بخوانید و سپس به سوال پاسخ دهید. ده دقیقه برای انجام هر کاری فرصت خواهید داشت. شما باید حدود 120 کلمه بنویسید.
Answer Template 1
- This is a challenging topic, but I think that [respond directly to the question].
- I strongly agree with [student]’s idea that [mention one point made by the student].
- I’d add that [expand on the point with your own idea].
- While [other student] raised the relevant point that [mention one point made by the other student], he/she didn’t mention that [challenge that point].
- For example [elaborate on your challenge with your own ideas].
Answer Template 2
- While I appreciate the points mentioned by both [name] and [name], I think that…
- [elaborate on your idea for a few sentences]
- Remember that [elaborate on your point], so [elaborate on your point].
- Some people may feel that [mention a potential challenge], but [respond to this challenge].
نوشته های شما با ترکیبی از امتیازدهی هوش مصنوعی و رأی دهندگان معتبر ETS نمره می گیرند.
نمونه پاسخ به یک سوال تسک یک:
The lecture explained why the computerized voting system can not replace the traditional voting system. There are the following three reasons.
First of all, not every one can use computers correctly. Some people do not have access to computers, some people not used of computers, and some people are even scared of this new technology. If the voters do not know how to use a computer, how do you expect them to finish the voting process through computers? This directly refutes the reading passage which states that computerized voting is easier by just touching the screen.
Secondly, computers may make the same mistakes as people do. As computers are programmed by human beings, thus errors are inevitable in the computer system. Problems caused by computer voting systems may be more serious than those caused by people. A larger number of votes might be miss counted or even removed from the system. Furthermore, it would take more energy to recount the votes. Again this contradicts what is stated in the reading which stated that only people will make mistakes in counting.
Thirdly, computerized voting system is not reliable because it has not reached a stable status. People trust computers to conduct banking transactions because the computerized banking system is being used daily and frequently and has been stable. How ever, the voting does not happen as often as banking thus the computerized voting system has not been proved to be totally reliable.
All in all, not everyone can use a computer properly, computer cause mistakes and computerized voting system is not reliable are the main reasons why computerized voting system can not replace the traditional voting system.
نمونه پاسخ به یک سوال تسک دو:
In the past 200 years, tons of scientific discoveries or technological inventions have been shown to the world. If I had to choose one in particular it will probably be vaccine or antibiotics. With Pasteur's work and discoveries, the world changed in a way people couldn't imagine. So many people were dying really young because at that time life's conditions were not as good as the one we have now. With vaccine, we could now irradicate diseases that were killing millions of people, we learn so much about the immune system and ways our body was reacting to pathogens and the answers he could produce to defend us against it. Medicine evolved so much and keeps evolving every day because scientists are curious to understand how our body is working and how he is able to communicate with our environment. People aged 40 are now not that old and still have a really long life to live and enjoy when 2 centuries ago it was synonymous of 80% chance of dying.
دیدگاه خود را بنویسید